34 posts / 0 new
Last post
jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40
PlayFeyTeaser ad on YouTube. Anybody know about this?

On April 15 a short video called PlayFey Teaser was posted on YouTube. Search on YouTube as I have it here and the vid will come up. Apparently one girl is playing Katie Fey and the other is Eugenia. If you click the link in the top right of the video it will take you a Facebook page relating to the subject. Anybody know anything about this?

vrizer's picture
vrizer
Offline
Joined: 10/07/2011 - 13:29

Damn, neither I have an iPhone nor an Android cell phone.

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

As far as I can tell, whatever this is going to be is  not available yet. But the video is interesting.

 

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Ah, there are ways and means, ways and means...

vrizer's picture
vrizer
Offline
Joined: 10/07/2011 - 13:29

Do you see what I see?

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

Yes, I did see that. And I guess that's Eugenia. However, If you look at the very first frame that comes up in the video, I think that is the other girl.  So, I don't know if this is a compilation video between  the two of them or what. Anyway, the vid is definitely kinky.         

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

I don't know where you get the idea from that there are two different people in this video...

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Fuck yeah, new Jenya material! How long have I been waiting for this day. Our toil in the desert may finally be over :)

edit: 720p trailer from youtube for those who want it.

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Judging by the photos, these were shot in possibly September of last year.

jeffs007's picture
jeffs007
Offline
Paparazzi
Joined: 05/02/2009 - 14:16

I have serious doubts about the authenticity here. There is another photo of this shot with full head to toe visuals of the supposed "Jenyas" on the katie blogia site.. These may be images of her face but I have doubts about the bodies. 

1. In the center shot she did NOT wear a belt in the original shoot this is supposed to represent.The jeans were much darker and the cuff was thicker in the original. The plaid on the shirt in this shot is much bigger than in the authentic photo.Her legs are too thick. Only the boots appear to be correct. FAKE!
2.The girl in the orange dress, which I've never seen Jenya wear, has way too thick calves and the girl in the white panties has thighs like a football player. Overall Jenya's legs are much thinner. FAKE.
3.I have never seen Jenya wear a white dress like the one on the left or shoes of that style. They look clunky and not fashionable and ankles are too thick. FAKE.
4.Only the girl in stockings and garter belt has legs, ankles, feet and a body that could be Jenya's. 
I don't know what these guys are trying to accomplish but I'm not interested. There is too much of her real stuff out there to have any interest in fraud like this.
djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Erm, no.

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

If I am interpreting what the Feyplay website is saying correctly, it is that they will be offering Eugenia along with her alter ego, Katie Fey. Eugenia will be Eugenia but that Katie will be played by a different model. And that different model is the  woman in the four scantily clad pics you see. The question I have is does Eugenia Diodriychuk have the legal right to the name Katie Fey?  If she had a smart lawyer, she probably does. However, if you visit their facebook page, they mention Eugenia by name and the picture of her in a black dress is definitely her.

So I am withholding judgement on the sites legitimacy for the time being. But, I, like you, am suspicious. Here is what the blurb says: Playboy model Eugenia Diordiychuk and her charming alter ego Katie Fey coming soon to your mobile device! Follow us on Facebook to get the latest updates

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

You know alter ego doesn't mean doppelganger, right? It means a person's other self or personality. Like how Ariel Castro had one side that was a friendly musician, and another that was a hostile abductor and tormentor. 

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

What I am saying is that this could be a marketing gimmick. You get a well known name to endorse the product (Eugenia) but you hire a similar model to play the part of Katie. That would mean that Eugenia would do some modeling but the majority of things would be done by Katie. Why? Econom ics. The price Jenya could command would be enormous compared to what an unknown model could.

Now, I don't know if any of that is the case or not.  I have some questions about this whole concept, anyway. 1. Unless the people operating katiefey.com are very sloppy, I seriously doubt that Jenya has any rights to that name. I would be extremely surprised if she did, because you  have to believe that the owners of the website copyrighted the name and logo long ago. 2. This is mentioned nowhere on her facebook page. You would think that she would be promoting it there.

Anyway, I have tweeted her and asked her it this is legit. We'll see if I get an answer.

jeffs007's picture
jeffs007
Offline
Paparazzi
Joined: 05/02/2009 - 14:16

I would bet she has NO involvement in this opportunistic FARCE at all. She is too classy for this crap. Look at the recent black and white photo of her in a desert setting on her Facebook page. If she were going to do anything involving her image it would be something 'artsy' and classy like that photo (which offers the promise of more like that one this Sunday morning).

I don't believe she would do anything like this Playfey thing and certainly not under that name. 
Now the Katie Fey guys, who I don't believe are among her favorite people, might try to put something like this together themselves to try to capitalize on her continued fame. I wouldn't put it past them. They have access to the Katie Fey name. As long as they don't use Met-Art images they might be able to get away with something that uses images that they own. At any rate it's still CRAP.
djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Are you going mad? There is a video right there of her. There are photos Jenya posted on her Facebook page modelling the same clothes. The author is the same author of Wishlab that Jenya likes, and, if anybody spent a minute researching, they'd see that this person is in her friends list.

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

I'm not saying the video is not Jenya. I am saying I don't think the girls you see in those photos, except for the one in the orange dress, are Jenya. Get a face on picture of Jenya and compare it with those faces. Look at the eyes, and look at the mouths. Do you really think those are Jenya?

Don't look like her to me, but maybe I'm wrong. As far as the clothes go, another participant here opined that he thinks that is all photoshop. So, I am not the only one who has noticed differences between Jenya and the Katie Fey's.

As far as my being mad--that happened a long time ago.

As far as Wishlab--never heard of it, but I will now investigate. However, if this is a collaboration between Jenya and the author of Wishlab don't you think this ad just might also be on Jenya's Facebook page?

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

I wasn't actually responding to you there. 

Anyway, yes, I do think it is Jenya; yes, I do think you are wrong; no, I don't think this would necessarily be on her Facebook page.
jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

I'm still mad--too much mercury while making hats

 

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

You address one of my questions--Would Jenya hold the copyrights to the Katie Fey name. I would think not, since the site is still operating. Of course, as she grew more popular, and if she got a smart lawyer, she may have been able to get concessions from the Katie Fey people. Only time will tell

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Your thinking process operates more by fancy than reason it seems.

jeffs007's picture
jeffs007
Offline
Paparazzi
Joined: 05/02/2009 - 14:16

I guess we'll see. Admittedly, this is just my opinion. I don't believe that she will put her 'stamp' on anything associated with the Katie Fey brand at this stage in her career. Especially after establishing so much fame under her own name. Certainly not  fake crap like Playfey.

Furthermore D.J., I can't believe that an astute observer of Eugenia as you are, can't see that the photo is 'doctored'. Parts of those girls are obviously not her body. Look closely. As I mentioned there are body parts that are clearly thicker than those of Jenya. I don't see how she could give her blessing to such a farce.
djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

An astute observer would remember that she went through a period where she put on a little extra weight.  You even commented on this on the Shaman team stuff. 

Well, let's just hope for you that you are right and they are doctored - because some of what you have written looks pretty thoughtless there if you are wrong.
jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

Thanks for the heads up on the trailer. I downloaded it. I did not go back in look, but though this was posted this year, I'm pretty sure I saw on their facebook site that it was shot in 2011. I'd have to go back to make sure, but I do remember seeing two different dates.

Now, do you know where I can download a high quality 4 Kings video from the rock video she was in a couple of years ago?

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

This is the version of it which I have (73MB, 720x576 Xvid).

I want to see high quality on the new content, but alas, more than likely I will not get my wish. 
jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

Look at this vidcap

I downloaded the 4 Kings. Far more superior to anything else I've found. Thanks.

You may be interested to know that at katiefey.blogia.com they have revamped their site a little and now many of the vids come with vidcaps. An interesting one is from the Jenya vid where she is walking around doing not much of anything in the winter and she kisses some guy and makes his mouth bleed. Well, I always thought she bit his lip. But if this vidcap means anything, it looks like it was something other than his lip she bit. See what you think.

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

   composite vidcap from the Met-Art movie Vertical by Leonardo.      Made a  mistake with a post and created a blank page, so I'm filling it in. . The Hidden A-Gen-Da.

vrizer's picture
vrizer
Offline
Joined: 10/07/2011 - 13:29

She makes us wait too long, this is this worst thing about her.

freigeist31
Offline
Joined: 04/22/2009 - 21:22

I agree with Vrizer ... even the most beautiful woman becomes less and less interesting if she is not even able to release some normal pictures given the big fan community she has (if she cared about it at all)

jeffs007's picture
jeffs007
Offline
Paparazzi
Joined: 05/02/2009 - 14:16

Guys. I would be surprised if she has any control over the rate at which Met-Art releases her photos. I would guess that the minute those photos are taken they become the property of Met-Art to be released at their pleasure. Since she seems to have done nothing new in a great while, they are probably releasing any limited inventory of her photos SLOWLY.  Their "Golden Goose" appears to have stopped laying eggs and they're coveting what they have remaining. I don't think it is her fault.

Concerning her affinity for her fan base, she has expressed in past interviews that she has little to no concern for her fan base. She modeled for her own pleasure. We were just fortunate bystanders. Any personal photos she releases are for herself and her friends. 

I think our only hope is that she, someday, misses her modeling career and returns for her own pleasure.

jenmyluv
Offline
ED.Com SupporterInspired by JenyaPaparazzi
Joined: 03/25/2013 - 01:40

You are absolutely correct. Jenya would most likely have no control over when sets are released. That would be Met-Art who, as you suggest, would bleed every drop of blood they could get out of their investment. Once the inventory is dried up, you can expect Met-Art's subscription rate to drop a bit. Jenya is the only reason I'm a member, which is going to change very soon if nothing new is released.

djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

Ok, well, these have turned up on twitter now. It appears she was shot on green screen and then backgrounds were superimposed. 

The quality of these is fairly awful and hopefully isn't representative of what's to come (if it is, then it's incredibly disappointing). 
















jeffs007's picture
jeffs007
Offline
Paparazzi
Joined: 05/02/2009 - 14:16

"Fairly awful" might be an understatement. This 'cartoon' is certainly not representative of the work of one of the most talented and beautiful models in the world. Compare this to her work that we have loved for years. If she had any involvement in this, I believe it would

not

be advantageous or flattering to her or her burgeoning career.

I stand by my original assessment. I believe this to be a facsimile of her created thru some computerized manipulation. It is CRAP!!! It is such poor quality that even if it were later found out to be authentic it would get none of my time.
djmax's picture
djmax
Offline
ED.Com SupporterKnowledge KeeperPaparazzi
Joined: 01/19/2009 - 22:05

By fairly awful I meant the actual quality of the photos rather than the content. She is blurred and I can see jpeg artifaction. If that's how the final content looks, considering they would have taken high-resolution photographs of her originally, then it's a big disappointment.

edit: afterthought, it's possible these may be screencaps from a movie, which would explain why she looks so blurry.